The influence that the religious, intellectual, and political demagogues have in a free society poses a much greater danger to mankind than the risk of allowing a businessman to use his property as he chooses.
Ron Paul, Liberty Defined. (via minarchyintheusa)
Uh, says a guy who uses his political position to push his religious and “intellectual” (if you can call libertarianism that) ideology and uses his private businesses to deceive women and publish racist rants from dipshits who write at a second grade level.
His statement is dumb anyway. If a businessman were to use his property to increase his influence as a religious, intellectual, or political demagogue, then we I guess have Ron Paul’s dreamworld? Or just a statement he made that sounds like it’s saying something, but really isn’t?